Table 4 |
||||||
|
Tracking of energy and macronutrient intakesa between age 15y and young adulthood (mean age 22.0y). |
||||||
| Males |
Females |
|||||
|
|
||||||
| n |
κ |
P |
n |
κ |
P |
|
|
|
||||||
| Energy (MJ/d) |
245 |
0.169 |
<0.0001 |
231 |
0.154 |
0.001 |
| Protein (g/d) |
245 |
0.169 |
<0.0001 |
231 |
0.202 |
<0.0001 |
| % energy from protein |
245 |
0.019 |
0.683 |
231 |
0.098 |
0.039 |
| Total fat (g/d) |
245 |
0.117 |
0.011 |
231 |
0.152 |
0.001 |
| % energy from fat |
245 |
0.143 |
0.002 |
231 |
0.051 |
0.282 |
| Carbohydrate (g/d) |
245 |
0.114 |
0.013 |
231 |
0.120 |
0.011 |
| % energy from carbohydrate |
245 |
0.117 |
0.011 |
231 |
0.063 |
0.182 |
|
|
||||||
|
a At both timepoints, energy and macronutrient intakes were assessed using the diet history method. κ indicates extent of tracking, and can be interpreted as follows: κ < 0.20, poor tracking; κ 0.21–0.40, fair; κ 0.41–0.60, moderate; κ 0.61–0.8, good; κ 0.81–1.0, very good (Altman, 1991). |
||||||
|
Boreham et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2004 1:14 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-1-14 |
||||||