Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from IJBNPA and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Short paper

Interrupting long periods of sitting: good STUFF

Geert M Rutten1*, Hans H Savelberg2, Stuart JH Biddle3 and Stef PJ Kremers1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2 Department of Human Movement Sciences, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands

3 Loughborough University, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Ashby Road, Loughborough Leicestershire, United Kingdom

For all author emails, please log on.

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2013, 10:1  doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-1

Published: 2 January 2013

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that sedentary behaviour is in itself a health risk, regardless of the daily amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Therefore, sedentary behaviour should be targeted as important health behaviour.

It is known that even relatively small changes of health behaviour often require serious efforts from an individual and from people in their environment to become part of their lifestyle. Therefore, interventions to promote healthy behaviours should ideally be simple, easy to perform and easily available. Since sitting is likely to be highly habitual, confrontation with an intervention should almost automatically elicit a reaction of getting up, and thus break up and reduce sitting time. One important prerequisite for successful dissemination of such an intervention could be the use of a recognisable term relating to sedentary behaviour, which should have the characteristics of an effective brand name. To become wide spread, this term may need to meet three criteria: the “Law of the few”, the “Stickiness factor”, and the “Power of context”. For that purpose we introduce STUFF: Stand Up For Fitness. STUFF can be defined as “interrupting long sitting periods by short breaks”, for instance, interrupting sitting every 30 min by standing for at least five minutes.

Even though we still need evidence to test the health-enhancing effects of interrupted sitting, we hope that the introduction of STUFF will facilitate the testing of the social, psychological and health effects of interventions to reduce sitting time.

Keywords:
Sedentary behavior; Physical activity; Sitting time reduction; Health promotion; Dissemination