Table 2 |
|||||||||
|
Pearson r Correlations between Pros, Cons, and Self-efficacy for Fruit, Vegetable and Fish consumption |
|||||||||
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Pros vegetable (1) |
1 |
.13*** |
.82*** |
.15*** |
.40*** |
.18*** |
.21*** |
.20*** |
.04 |
| Cons vegetable (2) |
1 |
.16*** |
.74*** |
.05 |
.53*** |
-.31*** |
-.12*** |
-.14*** |
|
| Pros fruit (3) |
1 |
.15*** |
.39*** |
.19*** |
.13*** |
.26*** |
.02 |
||
| Cons fruit (4) |
1 |
.08* |
.55*** |
-.17*** |
-.24*** |
-.05 |
|||
| Pros fish (5) |
1 |
.32*** |
.09** |
.09** |
.49*** |
||||
| Cons fish (6) |
1 |
-.13*** |
-.12*** |
-.17*** |
|||||
| Self-efficacy vegetable (7) |
1 |
.45*** |
.25*** |
||||||
| Self-efficacy fruit (8) |
1 |
.22*** |
|||||||
| Self-efficacy fish (9) |
1 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Note. * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001 |
|||||||||
|
De Vet et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2006 3:13 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-13 |
|||||||||
