Table 2 |
||
|
Results from the regression models predicting adolescents' physical activity |
||
|
Parameters from each regression model |
β (SE) |
R2 for model |
|
|
||
|
Main effect of risk |
-.37 (.17)** |
.23** |
|
Main effect of maternal support |
.12 (.10) ** |
|
|
Interaction between risk and maternal support |
.23 (.18) ** |
|
|
Main effect of risk |
-.31 (.17) ** |
.26** |
|
Main effect of paternal support |
.25 (.12) ** |
|
|
Interaction between risk and paternal support |
.14 (.18) † |
|
|
Main effect of risk |
-.33 (.17) ** |
.24** |
|
Main effect of sibling support |
.16 (.12) ** |
|
|
Interaction between risk and sibling support |
.21 (.18) ** |
|
|
Main effect of risk |
-.25 (.17) ** |
.33** |
|
Main effect of peer support |
.34 (.11) ** |
|
|
Interaction between risk and peer support |
.22 (.17) * |
|
|
|
||
|
Note: † p < .10 * p < .05 ** p < .01 High risk coded as 1, low risk coded as 0. The beta-weight for risk is slightly different across models because a different source of support was included in each model. The resulting beta weight is the independent effect of risk. |
||
|
Davison and Schmalz International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2006 3:5 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-5 |
||