Table 3 |
||||||||||||
|
Regression models predicting fruit and juice intake |
||||||||||||
| Step One (Personal characteristic |
Step Two (Step 1 + nearest environmental variables) |
Step Three (Step 1 + psychosocial variables) |
Step Five (Step 1 + nearest environmental & psychosocial variables) |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| Variable |
Coeff) |
Z |
P |
Coeff |
Z |
P |
Coeff |
Z |
P |
Coeff |
Z |
P |
|
|
||||||||||||
| BMI %tile |
0.00 |
1.04 |
0.299 |
0.01 |
1.23 |
0.220 |
0.01 |
1.29 |
0.198 |
0.01 |
1.46 |
0.145 |
| Age |
-0.22 |
-1.24 |
0.216 |
-0.22 |
-1.26 |
0.207 |
-0.10 |
-0.65 |
0.516 |
-0.11 |
-0.72 |
0.474 |
| PG (ref GED) |
-0.35 |
-0.39 |
0.693 |
-0.07 |
-0.08 |
0.938 |
-0.69 |
-0.88 |
0.381 |
-0.47 |
-0.60 |
0.548 |
| College |
-0.99 |
-1.10 |
0.270 |
-0.76 |
-0.85 |
0.397 |
-1.22 |
-1.56 |
0.119 |
-1.04 |
-1.32 |
0.186 |
| Tech College |
-1.42 |
-1.49 |
0.135 |
-1.17 |
-1.26 |
0.209 |
-1.26 |
-1.51 |
0.130 |
-1.09 |
-1.33 |
0.182 |
| Ethnicity (ref Anglo) |
-0.49 |
-1.10 |
0.271 |
-0.72 |
-1.59 |
0.111 |
-0.38 |
-0.95 |
0.341 |
-1.39 |
-1.39 |
0.164 |
| Social Desirability |
0.03 |
1.12 |
0.262 |
0.03 |
1.09 |
0.277 |
0.02 |
0.94 |
0.347 |
0.03 |
0.97 |
0.332 |
| Distance to Small Food Store |
- |
- |
- |
0.00 |
3.07 |
0.002 |
- |
- |
0.00 |
2.63 |
0.008 |
|
| Distance to Fast Food |
- |
- |
- |
-0.00 |
-2.76 |
0.006 |
- |
- |
-0.00 |
-2.52 |
0.012 |
|
| FJ Home Availability |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.27 |
6.37 |
< 0.001 |
0.27 |
6.38 |
< 0.001 |
| FJ Preferences |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.06 |
2.80 |
0.005 |
0.05 |
2.31 |
0.021 |
| Within Troop R2 |
0.0468 |
0.0937 |
0.2495 |
0.2877 |
||||||||
| Between Troop R2 |
0.0297 |
0.1317 |
0.5398 |
0.5380 |
||||||||
| Overall R2 |
0.0523 |
0.1064 |
0.2485 |
0.3155 |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Step Four: Distance to the nearest Small Food Store (SFS) was associated with FJ preferences (z = 2.17, p = 0.030) but not availability of fruit and juice (z = 0.04, p = 0.968). Distance to the nearest fast food restaurant was not associated with FJ preferences (z = 0.35, p = 0.724) or FJ availability (z = -0.57, p = 0.570) Sobel test indicated that Fruit and Juice preferences partially mediated (34%) the relationship between distance to nearest Small Food Store (SFS) and low fat vegetable intake (z = 1.805, p = 0.071) |
||||||||||||
|
Jago et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2007 4:35 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-35 |
||||||||||||