Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Characteristics associated with US Walk to School programs

Dianne S Ward1 email, Laura Linnan2 email, Amber Vaughn3 email, Brian Neelon3 email, Sarah L Martin4 email and Janet E Fulton4 email

Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

author email corresponding author email

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2007, 4:67doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-67

Published: 19 December 2007

Abstract

Participation in Walk to School (WTS) programs has grown substantially in the US since its inception; however, no attempt has been made to systematically describe program use or factors associated with implementation of environment/policy changes.

Objective

Describe the characteristics of schools' WTS programs by level of implementation.

Methods

Representatives from 450 schools from 42 states completed a survey about their WTS program's infrastructure and activities, and perceived impact on walking to school. Level of implementation was determined from a single question to which respondents reported participation in WTS Day only (low), WTS Day and additional programs (medium), or making policy/environmental change (high).

Results

The final model showed number of community groups involved was positively associated with higher level of implementation (OR = 1.78, 95%CI = 1.44, 2.18), as was funding (OR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.26, 1.92), years of participation (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.23, 1.70), and use of a walkability assessment (OR = 3.22, 95%CI = 1.84, 5.64). Implementation level was modestly associated with increased walking (r = 0.18).

Conclusion

Strong community involvement, some funding, repeat participation, and environmental audits are associated with progms that adopt environmental/policy change, and seem to facilitate walking to school.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.