Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch

Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents

Richard G Prins1 email, Anke Oenema1 email, Klazine van der Horst1,2 email and Johannes Brug1,3 email

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

ETH Zürich, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Consumer Behavior, Zürich, Switzerland

EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

author email corresponding author email

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2009, 6:70doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-70

Published: 15 October 2009

Abstract

Background

This study examined the associations of the perceived and objective environment with adolescent engagement in sports activities and walking and cycling in leisure time. It also explored the degree of agreement between objective and perceived availability of physical activity (PA) facilities in neighborhoods.

Methods

Cross-sectional data on physical activity, the perceived availability of physical activity opportunities (perceived physical environment) was assessed through a questionnaire and the objective availability of PA opportunities (objective physical environment) was obtained through GIS data. The final sample included 654 adolescents with a mean age of 14.1 (SD = 1.2) years.

Results

Perceived availability of sports facilities and parks was significantly associated with engaging in sports (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.16-2.56) and with walking and cycling in leisure time (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.07-2.57) respectively. Agreement between objective and perceived environment was low to moderate with Kappa values ranging from -0.005 to 0.053.

Conclusion

The perceived environment was the stronger correlate of PA behavior among adolescents. There were substantial differences between assessments of objective and perceived physical environment.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.