Table 4

Use and Appreciation of the two computer-tailored interventions.

Interventionbasic

Number (%)

Interventionplus

Number (%)

χ2


Use (0-1)

Readb

367/388 (95%)

400/418 (96%)

1.85

Savedb

215/355 (61%)

282/381 (74%)

15.17*

Discussedb

125/355 (35%)

151/381 (40%)

1.53

Use environmental information (0-1)

Read

-

451/478 (94%)

Contacted sports club

-

11/470 (2.3%)

Visited website

-

52/470 (11%)

Walked/Cycled trailsb

-

161/393 (41%)

Mapped out walking/cycling routeb

-

57/393 (15%)

Did exercisesb

-

73/393 (19%)


Appreciation (-2 to +2)

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Fa

Interesting

0.65 ± 0.72

0.85 ± 0.58

18.49**

Inviting

0.56 ± 0.75

0.80 ± 0.69

22.53**

Perceived individualization

0.26 ± 0.95

0.45 ± 0.86

11.36**

Comprehensible

0.98 ± 0.51

0.99 ± 0.46

0.00

Trustworthy

0.81 ± 0.58

0.93 ± 0.50

9.49**

Novelty

-0.34 ± 0.1.0

-0.32 ± 0.97

1.31

Right quantity

0.72 ± 0.64

0.75 ± 0.70

1.91

Irritating

-0.93 ± 0.87

-1.07 ± 0.95

4.62*

Appreciation environmental information (-2 to +2)

Interestingb

-

0.74 ± 0.73

Motivatingb

-

-0.14 ± 0.94


a corrected for education level

b measured with 6-months questionnaire

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; numbers in bold typeface: significant associations

van Stralen et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2009 6:83   doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-83

Open Data