Table 5 |
||||||||
|
Factors associated with likelihood of walking/cycling home from school using logistic regression modelling |
||||||||
|
Boys (n = 631) |
Girls (n = 639) |
|||||||
|
OR |
SE |
95%CI |
P |
OR |
SE |
95%CI |
P |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Likelihood of walking/cycling home from school |
||||||||
|
Local-IM* |
1.41 |
0.201 |
1.07-1.87 |
0.014 |
1.49 |
0.251 |
1.07-2.07 |
0.018 |
|
Area-IM |
1.03 |
0.167 |
0.75-1.42 |
0.833 |
0.91 |
0.169 |
0.64-1.31 |
0.617 |
|
Aesthetics |
0.93 |
0.165 |
0.65-1.31 |
0.682 |
1.04 |
0.162 |
0.77-1.41 |
0.798 |
|
Nuisance |
0.68 |
0.151 |
0.44-1.05 |
0.084 |
0.61 |
0.127 |
0.40-0.91 |
0.017 |
|
Personal safety |
0.83 |
0.208 |
0.51-1.35 |
0.462 |
1.35 |
0.299 |
0.88-2.08 |
0.172 |
|
Traffic safety |
1.01 |
0.233 |
0.64-1.59 |
0.995 |
0.72 |
0.127 |
0.51-1.01 |
0.064 |
|
Social Norm |
0.89 |
0.190 |
0.59-1.36 |
0.462 |
1.07 |
0.273 |
0.65-1.77 |
0.790 |
|
Access(1) |
1.87 |
0.557 |
1.04-3.36 |
0.035 |
1.00 |
0.281 |
0.58-1.74 |
0.989 |
|
Access (2) |
2.07 |
0.460 |
1.34-3.21 |
0.001 |
1.43 |
0.322 |
0.92-2.23 |
0.110 |
|
Playspace |
0.92 |
0.165 |
0.65-1.31 |
0.657 |
0.86 |
0.161 |
0.59-1.24 |
0.430 |
|
Constraint |
1.04 |
0.180 |
0.74-1.46 |
0.804 |
1.22 |
0.178 |
0.92-1.62 |
0.173 |
|
Distance |
0.99 |
0.001 |
0.98-0.99 |
0.001 |
0.99 |
0.001 |
0.98-0.99 |
0.001 |
|
Daylight |
1.00 |
0.001 |
0.99-1.00 |
0.346 |
0.99 |
0.001 |
0.99-1.00 |
0.774 |
|
SDSBMI |
1.04 |
0.109 |
0.84-1.27 |
0.725 |
0.84 |
0.077 |
0.70-1.01 |
0.059 |
|
IMDscore |
0.98 |
0.006 |
0.97-0.99 |
0.034 |
0.98 |
0.007 |
0.97-0.99 |
0.040 |
|
Pubertal status |
0.91 |
0.138 |
0.68-1.23 |
0.556 |
1.14 |
0.132 |
0.91-1.43 |
0.249 |
|
|
||||||||
|
SDSBMI: standardised body mass index, IMD: Index of Multiple Deprivation Reference group: those who reported being driven by car to school Bold text indicates significant relationship *Note for analyses for passive vs active travel Local-IM did not include item "allowed to walk/cycle to school" without an adult. |
||||||||
|
Page et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010 7:17 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-17 |
||||||||
