Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from IJBNPA and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods

Graham Smith1, Christopher Gidlow2, Rachel Davey3 and Charles Foster4*

Author Affiliations

1 Institute for Environment, Sustainability and Regeneration, Staffordshire University, Mellor Building, College Road, Stoke on Trent, ST4 2DE, UK

2 Centre for Sport, Health and Exercise Research, Staffordshire University, Stoke on Trent, UK

3 Centre for Research and Action in Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

4 British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010, 7:34  doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-34

Published: 6 May 2010

Abstract

Background

Existing measures of perceptions of the environment associated with walking commonly rely on providing a definition of 'neighbourhood', e.g. 1 mile area around the home. We have little understanding of how these examples relate with adults' own geographical definitions of their neighbourhood area. Our pilot study examined the congruence between definitions used in environmental questionnaires and adults' own definitions of neighbourhood.

Methods

We conducted 58 face-to-face interviews with participants randomly selected from 10 areas of Stoke-on-Trent, England. Participants were shown printed maps showing their local area with road names and places of interest (e.g. shops, services, green space) and were asked: (i) to recall usual walking destinations (from their home); (ii) to draw their 'neighbourhood walking area' on the map. Annotated maps were scanned back into GIS for analysis.

Results

When asked to draw their 'neighbourhood' boundary, the resulting area drawn by participants on average represented only 16 ± 20% of the commonly used total straight-line buffer of 1 mile (or 1.6 km) with a range of 0.3% to 111%. Even when repeated using a network buffer (rather than straight-line) the same comparison resulted in a mean of 36% (± 47%) and a range of 0.6 to 245%.

Conclusions

We found that adults' interpretation of their neighbourhood area does not appear to relate accurately to the definitions typically used in research into environmental perceptions and walking. This mis-match warrants further investigation as definitions used in existing measures may be consistently misclassifying perceived local walking neighbourhoods.