Table 5 |
||||||
|
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of Vitalum groups |
||||||
|
Outcome |
Group |
Costs (euros) |
Improvement in outcome |
Difference with next less costly group |
ICER |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Costs |
Outcomes |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
Difference in total number of guidelines met |
control |
0 |
0.26 |
0 |
0.00 |
|
|
TPC |
57 |
0.62 |
57 |
0.36 |
160 |
|
|
combined |
80 |
0.50 |
23 |
-0.12 |
Dominated by control and TPC |
|
|
TMI |
107 |
0.40 |
27 |
-0.10 |
Dominated by control and TPC |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Quality-Adjusted Life-Years experienced over 73 weeks |
control |
0 |
1.07 |
0 |
0.00 |
|
|
TPC |
57 |
1.09 |
57 |
0.02 |
2,867 |
|
|
combined |
80 |
1.08 |
23 |
-0.01 |
Dominated by control and TPC |
|
|
TMI |
107 |
1.08 |
27 |
0.01 |
Dominated by extended dominance |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Note ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (difference in costs divided by difference in effects of two groups); TPC = tailored print communication; TMI = telephone motivational interviewing; combined = combination of TPC and TMI. |
||||||
|
van Keulen et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2010 7:64 doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-64 |
||||||
