Table 4

Fully adjusted logits on moderate to vigorous physical activity, by gendera

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Panel A: Female Sample
 OR
 95% CI
OR
 95% CI
OR
 95% CI




Parental Influence








Family Cohesion
 1.05
 (0.00 – 1.09)
 **
 1.02
 (0.99 – 1.06)
1.05
 (1.02 – 1.09)
 **
Parental Monitoring
 1.01
 (0.96 – 1.05)
1.01
 (0.97 – 1.06)
1.01
 (0.96 – 1.05)
Parent-Child Communication
 1.06
 (1.00 – 1.12)
 *
 1.05
 (0.99 – 1.11)
1.06
 (1.00 – 1.12)
 *
Parental Engagement
 1.19
 (1.11 – 1.27)
 ***
 1.18
 (1.10 – 1.26)
 ***
 1.19
 (1.11 – 1.27)
 ***
Adolescent Emotional Health








Self-Esteem
 ---
 ---
 ---
 1.04
 (1.02 – 1.06)
 ***
 ---
 ---
 ---
Depression
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 0.94
 (0.80 – 1.10)
N =
 6,730

6,730

6,730

F(29, 99)
 10.48

10.38

10.10











Panel B: Male Sample
 Model 4
Model 5
Model 6




Parental Influence








Family Cohesion
 1.05
 (1.02 – 1.09)
 **
 1.01
 (0.97 – 1.04)
1.04
 (1.01 – 1.08)
 *
Parental Monitoring
 1.01
 (0.95 – 1.06)
1.02
 (0.96 – 1.08)
1.01
 (0.95 – 1.07)
Parent-Child Communication
 1.08
 (1.01 – 1.16)
 *
 1.07
 (0.99 – 1.14)
1.08
 (1.01 – 1.17)
 *
Parental Engagement
 1.18
 (1.09 – 1.27)
 ***
 1.16
 (1.07 – 1.25)
 ***
 1.17
 (1.09 – 1.27)
 ***
Adolescent Emotional Health








Self-Esteem
 ---
 ---
 ---
 1.09
 (1.06 – 1.11)
 ***
 ---
 ---
 ---
Depression
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 ---
 0.79
 (0.64 – 0.95)
 *
N =
 6,516

6,516

6,516

F(29, 100)
 7.62

9.18

7.59

*** p ≤ .001, ** p ≤ .01, * p ≤ .05

a All models are adjusted for age, race-ethnicity, immigrant generation, family structure, number of siblings, and parent education. In addition, models for females and males were estimated separately. Estimates were adjusted for survey design effects.

Ornelas et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2007 4:3   doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-3